The result was delete. 1ne 23:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The following articles have been relisted for nomination following a deletion review:
The original nomination can be found here (
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sydney_bus_routes_100-199).
The original information that was said to be duplicated in the old List of bus routes in Sydney has now been deleted from the original page and there is no route information existing on Wikipedia for bus routes in Sydney. I vote to Merge this information all into one new page called List of Sydney bus routes. This can be fixed up and historical information added where appropriate. I suggest a Queensland-bus-route style template so the routes can easily be appended to railway station and other attraction pages. ( JROBBO 06:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)) reply
I'm not against information on bus services per se, but think that the information needs to have some sort of context. They should be something that someone can read and learn something from, and not just dry facts that are about as interesting to read as a bus timetable. -- Mako 08:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. 1ne 23:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The following articles have been relisted for nomination following a deletion review:
The original nomination can be found here (
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sydney_bus_routes_100-199).
The original information that was said to be duplicated in the old List of bus routes in Sydney has now been deleted from the original page and there is no route information existing on Wikipedia for bus routes in Sydney. I vote to Merge this information all into one new page called List of Sydney bus routes. This can be fixed up and historical information added where appropriate. I suggest a Queensland-bus-route style template so the routes can easily be appended to railway station and other attraction pages. ( JROBBO 06:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)) reply
I'm not against information on bus services per se, but think that the information needs to have some sort of context. They should be something that someone can read and learn something from, and not just dry facts that are about as interesting to read as a bus timetable. -- Mako 08:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC) reply