- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 01:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sword of al-Sham Brigades ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:N. All sources are wordpress, twitter or facebook. Ladsgroup overleg 16:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:08, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge? - I found the following sources:
- Business Insider - lists them as a group the CIA allows munitions sharing with
- RIAC - one mention, source has questionable reliability
- SITE Intelligence Group - has some documents that are not in English, I can't tell if they're good sources or not
- Gulf News - quote from the group's spokesman in a newspaper article about Assad
- It seems like most of the sources about this group come from places like wordpress or Twitter that are not reliable, secondary sources; you could maybe call them news (see WP:NOTNP). I don't think this can stand as an article on its own. It could maybe be merged into Belligerents_in_the_Syrian_Civil_War, or could just be deleted. Ikjbagl ( talk) 20:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 06:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Only a passing mention from Business Insider is all you can find. Harmanprtjhj ( talk) 17:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 01:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sword of al-Sham Brigades ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:N. All sources are wordpress, twitter or facebook. Ladsgroup overleg 16:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:08, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge? - I found the following sources:
- Business Insider - lists them as a group the CIA allows munitions sharing with
- RIAC - one mention, source has questionable reliability
- SITE Intelligence Group - has some documents that are not in English, I can't tell if they're good sources or not
- Gulf News - quote from the group's spokesman in a newspaper article about Assad
- It seems like most of the sources about this group come from places like wordpress or Twitter that are not reliable, secondary sources; you could maybe call them news (see WP:NOTNP). I don't think this can stand as an article on its own. It could maybe be merged into Belligerents_in_the_Syrian_Civil_War, or could just be deleted. Ikjbagl ( talk) 20:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 06:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Only a passing mention from Business Insider is all you can find. Harmanprtjhj ( talk) 17:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.