- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- Swiss Valley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A housing complex with no claim to notability per WP:NPLACE.
Also adding for the same reason:
- Cefncaeau (another housing row)
- Ddôl Fach (an unremarkable farm) ... discospinster talk 12:59, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Ddôl Fach is an unsourced article which actually qualifies for speedy deletion as an article about a business with no claim of significance, but since it is here we may as well let it run the AfD. The other two are ordinary housing estates with no claim of significance at all, and no sources either. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 19:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - I know the area (which is no reason to keep, I know) but it does contain not only the housing development but also a small series of reservoirs that certainly did provide the water suply for Llanelli. It is referenced within Wikipedia at Swiss Valley Reservoir and other sources show that it is a name in common use such as here and here and the community is well enoiugh established to have its own web site here. However Ddôl Fach is firmly a Delete. Velella Velella Talk 14:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. My criterion starts with the Ordnance Surveys maps, and Swiss Valley does not appear there. The Swiss Valley Reservoir article is valid within the topic of 'water', but that does not give any entitlement to a nearby settlement. Twiceuponatime ( talk) 09:18, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- Swiss Valley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A housing complex with no claim to notability per WP:NPLACE.
Also adding for the same reason:
- Cefncaeau (another housing row)
- Ddôl Fach (an unremarkable farm) ... discospinster talk 12:59, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Ddôl Fach is an unsourced article which actually qualifies for speedy deletion as an article about a business with no claim of significance, but since it is here we may as well let it run the AfD. The other two are ordinary housing estates with no claim of significance at all, and no sources either. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 19:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - I know the area (which is no reason to keep, I know) but it does contain not only the housing development but also a small series of reservoirs that certainly did provide the water suply for Llanelli. It is referenced within Wikipedia at Swiss Valley Reservoir and other sources show that it is a name in common use such as here and here and the community is well enoiugh established to have its own web site here. However Ddôl Fach is firmly a Delete. Velella Velella Talk 14:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. My criterion starts with the Ordnance Surveys maps, and Swiss Valley does not appear there. The Swiss Valley Reservoir article is valid within the topic of 'water', but that does not give any entitlement to a nearby settlement. Twiceuponatime ( talk) 09:18, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.