From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of blasphemy cases in Pakistan. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Swat lynching incident (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Horrible and highly condemnable incident but fails NEVENT. WP is not newspaper. Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I've merged the content into List of blasphemy cases in Pakistan to ensure that editors' efforts are not wasted. —  Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply
Merge per above. I mean it was already so in theory it can be redirected but, yes. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 12:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or Merge as per the above recomendation I do agree with the nominator's concern. 223.123.10.196 ( talk) 01:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - There is a continued coverage about the incident. see. Mfarazbaig ( talk) 13:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC) Mfarazbaig ( talk · contribs) is a confirmed [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{2}}}|sock puppet]] of [{{canonicalurl:User:{{{2}}}}} {{{2}}}] ([[User talk:{{{2}}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/{{{2}}}|contribs]]). reply
    • Mfarazbaig, OK but WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE also states coverage does not need to be ongoing for notability to be established, a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notable.Saqib ( talk I contribs) 14:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of blasphemy cases in Pakistan. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Swat lynching incident (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Horrible and highly condemnable incident but fails NEVENT. WP is not newspaper. Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I've merged the content into List of blasphemy cases in Pakistan to ensure that editors' efforts are not wasted. —  Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply
Merge per above. I mean it was already so in theory it can be redirected but, yes. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 12:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or Merge as per the above recomendation I do agree with the nominator's concern. 223.123.10.196 ( talk) 01:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - There is a continued coverage about the incident. see. Mfarazbaig ( talk) 13:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC) Mfarazbaig ( talk · contribs) is a confirmed [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{2}}}|sock puppet]] of [{{canonicalurl:User:{{{2}}}}} {{{2}}}] ([[User talk:{{{2}}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/{{{2}}}|contribs]]). reply
    • Mfarazbaig, OK but WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE also states coverage does not need to be ongoing for notability to be established, a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notable.Saqib ( talk I contribs) 14:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook