From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Suzanne Lachelier

Suzanne Lachelier (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG and ANYBIO, as she is a mere mention in these sources. She was a bit player in a larger drama regarding prisoners at Gitmo. WP:BIO1E applies. Efforts to redirect this have failed. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep -- Her work is discussed in Rachel Hajjar (2022). The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight against Torture. University of California. ISBN  0520378938., which I added to the article. This shows her role was of lasting importance given the ongoing coverage in RS. Furthermore, after she retired from the military, according to Hajjar, she continued to defend Guantanamo prisoners, showing that BIO1E isn't applicable. Central and Adams ( talk) 19:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Besides just the lack of widespread coverage, her role or discussion in that book doesn't exactly make up for the subject's reliability simply because her work is only mentioned. A stronger case could be made here if the book dedicated multiple chapters or specifically identified her role as integral. GuardianH ( talk) 21:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Suzanne Lachelier

Suzanne Lachelier (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG and ANYBIO, as she is a mere mention in these sources. She was a bit player in a larger drama regarding prisoners at Gitmo. WP:BIO1E applies. Efforts to redirect this have failed. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep -- Her work is discussed in Rachel Hajjar (2022). The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight against Torture. University of California. ISBN  0520378938., which I added to the article. This shows her role was of lasting importance given the ongoing coverage in RS. Furthermore, after she retired from the military, according to Hajjar, she continued to defend Guantanamo prisoners, showing that BIO1E isn't applicable. Central and Adams ( talk) 19:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Besides just the lack of widespread coverage, her role or discussion in that book doesn't exactly make up for the subject's reliability simply because her work is only mentioned. A stronger case could be made here if the book dedicated multiple chapters or specifically identified her role as integral. GuardianH ( talk) 21:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook