- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A merge, which won some support, can be discussed at the talk page. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 01:06, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sutil Island ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:GEOLAND is the guideline covering notability of islands. It says "The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article." So far it doesn't look like there are enough sources to build a real article (including from a cursory Google search), but maybe some new ones could be found. Otherwise, it should be merged into Santa Barbara Island. Kaldari ( talk) 03:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep or merge. It's a small (12 acre) and rocky island, but there are sufficient natural history and other sources to source a small article. Even if not, however, outright deletion is inappropriate, as merger with Santa Barbara Island or Channel Islands (California) would be appropriate. Neutrality talk 05:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep there are enough sources covering it in sufficient detail for a geographic feature e.g. 1, 2.-- Pontificalibus ( talk) 20:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Yeah, there's enough present for a brief article. A merge, however, would not be inappropriate. JoJo Anthrax ( talk) 14:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A merge, which won some support, can be discussed at the talk page. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 01:06, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sutil Island ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:GEOLAND is the guideline covering notability of islands. It says "The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article." So far it doesn't look like there are enough sources to build a real article (including from a cursory Google search), but maybe some new ones could be found. Otherwise, it should be merged into Santa Barbara Island. Kaldari ( talk) 03:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep or merge. It's a small (12 acre) and rocky island, but there are sufficient natural history and other sources to source a small article. Even if not, however, outright deletion is inappropriate, as merger with Santa Barbara Island or Channel Islands (California) would be appropriate. Neutrality talk 05:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep there are enough sources covering it in sufficient detail for a geographic feature e.g. 1, 2.-- Pontificalibus ( talk) 20:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Yeah, there's enough present for a brief article. A merge, however, would not be inappropriate. JoJo Anthrax ( talk) 14:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.