The result was keep. The consensus is that the sourcing, especially from Mother Jones Magazine passes GNG. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 15:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article about an activist and unsuccessful political candidate, not
properly sourcing any strong claim to passing our notability standards for activists or politicians. As always, candidates do not get articles just for being candidates per se, and that's especially true when they were only candidates for a city council -- even the incumbent councillor she ran against doesn't qualify for an article on that basis in and of itself, and the fact that she was running against her brother, while amusing, isn't significant enough to make her candidacy more special than other people's candidacies.
But this is referenced principally to
primary sources that aren't support for notability at all (i.e. her "staff" profiles on the self-published websites of organizations she's directly affiliated with), and doesn't show nearly enough
reliable source coverage in real media to make her encyclopedically notable for any of this.
Also, the page was created in draftspace and then immediately moved to mainspace by its own creator without a proper
WP:AFC review.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced considerably better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Borderline Keep All the reasons are about her environmental work, not her brief political efforts.
The result was keep. The consensus is that the sourcing, especially from Mother Jones Magazine passes GNG. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 15:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article about an activist and unsuccessful political candidate, not
properly sourcing any strong claim to passing our notability standards for activists or politicians. As always, candidates do not get articles just for being candidates per se, and that's especially true when they were only candidates for a city council -- even the incumbent councillor she ran against doesn't qualify for an article on that basis in and of itself, and the fact that she was running against her brother, while amusing, isn't significant enough to make her candidacy more special than other people's candidacies.
But this is referenced principally to
primary sources that aren't support for notability at all (i.e. her "staff" profiles on the self-published websites of organizations she's directly affiliated with), and doesn't show nearly enough
reliable source coverage in real media to make her encyclopedically notable for any of this.
Also, the page was created in draftspace and then immediately moved to mainspace by its own creator without a proper
WP:AFC review.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced considerably better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Borderline Keep All the reasons are about her environmental work, not her brief political efforts.