The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 07:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Delete She is 49 years old, so definitely not
WP:TOOSOON. I couldn't find sources proving that she is/was notable. --
Bbarmadillo (
talk) 16:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)reply
She's apparently 13ish but I can't find a source on that either. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:22, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: I vote for keep as she is notable for her role in
The Johnsons and has received an award courtesy of her role. I have included the needed reference to this and attempted to tidy up the article. I also deleted the birthdate as it is clearly wrong at the time of page creation.
Blossom Ozurumba (
talk) 10:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC) — Note: An editor has expressed a concern that editors have been
canvassed to this discussion. reply
Winning an award doesn't make someone notable - I won a national award in high school, it doesn't make me notable either. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: I vote for keep. She is notable because of her Award as Movie Personality of the Year 2017 which was reported by reputable Magazines like
Socialites Mag. Also, her roles in Tv series like:
The Johnsons and other series has made her a public figure in Nigeria. --
Uzoma Ozurumba (
talk) 12:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that editors have been
canvassed to this discussion. reply
Delete you can't base an article on a single reliable source. I have checked all other reliable Nigerian sources and found nothing. The subject is not known internationally and the awards are not themselves notable. A biography of a living person with one source where even the age cannot be verified clearly fails the requirements of
WP:NBIO. —
Frayæ (
Talk/
Spjall) 15:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Can we have more comments from experienced editors?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 16:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - As per nom, as per what the other users have already said by now. She just doesn't have a single significant role to support the existance of this article, and the icing on the cake is the lack of reliable sources.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk) 00:26, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 07:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Delete She is 49 years old, so definitely not
WP:TOOSOON. I couldn't find sources proving that she is/was notable. --
Bbarmadillo (
talk) 16:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)reply
She's apparently 13ish but I can't find a source on that either. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:22, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: I vote for keep as she is notable for her role in
The Johnsons and has received an award courtesy of her role. I have included the needed reference to this and attempted to tidy up the article. I also deleted the birthdate as it is clearly wrong at the time of page creation.
Blossom Ozurumba (
talk) 10:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC) — Note: An editor has expressed a concern that editors have been
canvassed to this discussion. reply
Winning an award doesn't make someone notable - I won a national award in high school, it doesn't make me notable either. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: I vote for keep. She is notable because of her Award as Movie Personality of the Year 2017 which was reported by reputable Magazines like
Socialites Mag. Also, her roles in Tv series like:
The Johnsons and other series has made her a public figure in Nigeria. --
Uzoma Ozurumba (
talk) 12:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that editors have been
canvassed to this discussion. reply
Delete you can't base an article on a single reliable source. I have checked all other reliable Nigerian sources and found nothing. The subject is not known internationally and the awards are not themselves notable. A biography of a living person with one source where even the age cannot be verified clearly fails the requirements of
WP:NBIO. —
Frayæ (
Talk/
Spjall) 15:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Can we have more comments from experienced editors?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 16:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - As per nom, as per what the other users have already said by now. She just doesn't have a single significant role to support the existance of this article, and the icing on the cake is the lack of reliable sources.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk) 00:26, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.