- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sung Kuo-ting ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After observing it had been flagged for notability concerns, I performed a WP:BEFORE search which reveals subject of the article falls short of WP:GNG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them & fail to satisfy WP:NPOL Celestina007 ( talk) 15:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree. Overall it fails the WP:GNG. STSC ( talk) 22:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete county council members are not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. County council is not a level of office that confers an automatic inclusion freebie — making a person notable for this requires evidence that he's significantly more notable than the norm, not just verification that he exists. But the sources here aren't doing that: one is Facebook, which is not a notability-supporting or reliable source at all; one is a simple directory list, which is not a notability-supporting source at all; and the two that come from actual media just namecheck his existence without being about him to any non-trivial degree, so that isn't enough to make him more notable than most other county councillors. Bearcat ( talk) 15:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per all of the above. Local politicians, unless they are of world class city governments, are almost never notable. Bearian ( talk) 19:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sung Kuo-ting ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After observing it had been flagged for notability concerns, I performed a WP:BEFORE search which reveals subject of the article falls short of WP:GNG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them & fail to satisfy WP:NPOL Celestina007 ( talk) 15:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree. Overall it fails the WP:GNG. STSC ( talk) 22:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete county council members are not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. County council is not a level of office that confers an automatic inclusion freebie — making a person notable for this requires evidence that he's significantly more notable than the norm, not just verification that he exists. But the sources here aren't doing that: one is Facebook, which is not a notability-supporting or reliable source at all; one is a simple directory list, which is not a notability-supporting source at all; and the two that come from actual media just namecheck his existence without being about him to any non-trivial degree, so that isn't enough to make him more notable than most other county councillors. Bearcat ( talk) 15:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per all of the above. Local politicians, unless they are of world class city governments, are almost never notable. Bearian ( talk) 19:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.