- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Enigma msg 07:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Suji Park ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod removed by article creator with rationale "disagree with prod". Article does not appear to meet WP:ARTIST or pass WP:GNG. Searches are complicated by there being a more well known US chef with the same name but I haven't found any significant coverage and all the references presently in the article don't appear to establish significant coverage either. ... CJ [a Kiwi] in Oz 09:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - according to /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals notability is established for artists who have received significant critical attention. The sources used in this article constitute such attention. MurielMary ( talk) 09:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- keep - seems to be recognised by a number of regional museums. -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 20:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes WP:CREATIVE point 4 The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. NZFC (talk) 21:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Further to what User:NZFC has to say, point 4d would at least apply to the
Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki.
Schwede
66 23:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- it does not, as several museum collections means more than one. 104.163.159.237 ( talk) 03:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It doesn't matter if the subject meets an SNG when she has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, which is the case here.
Vexations (
talk) 22:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- I see one citation which is NOT related to the subject (the ODT). All the others are art-related and therefore related to the subject. Or am I missing something??? DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 04:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:CREATIVE point 4 Theredproject ( talk) 02:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Enigma msg 07:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Suji Park ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod removed by article creator with rationale "disagree with prod". Article does not appear to meet WP:ARTIST or pass WP:GNG. Searches are complicated by there being a more well known US chef with the same name but I haven't found any significant coverage and all the references presently in the article don't appear to establish significant coverage either. ... CJ [a Kiwi] in Oz 09:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - according to /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals notability is established for artists who have received significant critical attention. The sources used in this article constitute such attention. MurielMary ( talk) 09:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- keep - seems to be recognised by a number of regional museums. -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 20:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes WP:CREATIVE point 4 The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. NZFC (talk) 21:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Further to what User:NZFC has to say, point 4d would at least apply to the
Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki.
Schwede
66 23:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- it does not, as several museum collections means more than one. 104.163.159.237 ( talk) 03:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It doesn't matter if the subject meets an SNG when she has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, which is the case here.
Vexations (
talk) 22:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- I see one citation which is NOT related to the subject (the ODT). All the others are art-related and therefore related to the subject. Or am I missing something??? DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 04:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:CREATIVE point 4 Theredproject ( talk) 02:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.