The result was delete (transwikied). John Reaves (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Article for a webcomic. It asserts notability, so it's not a candidate for A7. However, the article still does not satisfy the notability guidelines for web content (website hits aren't on WP:WEB, and it only "nearly" reached the top 10 of a toplist), and the article reads somewhat like an advertisement. There is also some crystal-ballism afoot, and all but one of the sources are the comic itself. Core desat 08:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete (transwikied). John Reaves (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Article for a webcomic. It asserts notability, so it's not a candidate for A7. However, the article still does not satisfy the notability guidelines for web content (website hits aren't on WP:WEB, and it only "nearly" reached the top 10 of a toplist), and the article reads somewhat like an advertisement. There is also some crystal-ballism afoot, and all but one of the sources are the comic itself. Core desat 08:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC) reply