- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
SubscribeStar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SubscribeStar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unimportant company that only got temporary coverage because of media drama, WP:ORG. Most of the references in this page had no relevance to SubscribeStar whatsoever and some did not mention Subscribestar once, and contained user-created content (Youtube videos as references). Christiaanp ( talk) 22:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 21. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 23:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- N*Delete or draftify. there is no apparent content worth an article. If it is suggested theremight be, it should be draftified until it is added. DGG ( talk ) 01:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: There is a problem here. The nominator has deleted the irrelevant references, making it a wee bit difficult to validate the claims in the nomination. Prima facie, this article is a gossip piece, and as such, rubbish. Delete. Whiteguru ( talk) 12:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - there seems to be some coverage in third party sources. PeepleLikeYou ( talk) 06:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or Draftify This seems WP:TOOSOON. This website doesn't seem like it has been around for long and it might end up not lasting very long, meaning that the coverage of its creation drama would fall under WP:ONEEVENT. ★Trekker ( talk) 18:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
SubscribeStar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SubscribeStar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unimportant company that only got temporary coverage because of media drama, WP:ORG. Most of the references in this page had no relevance to SubscribeStar whatsoever and some did not mention Subscribestar once, and contained user-created content (Youtube videos as references). Christiaanp ( talk) 22:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 21. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 23:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- N*Delete or draftify. there is no apparent content worth an article. If it is suggested theremight be, it should be draftified until it is added. DGG ( talk ) 01:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: There is a problem here. The nominator has deleted the irrelevant references, making it a wee bit difficult to validate the claims in the nomination. Prima facie, this article is a gossip piece, and as such, rubbish. Delete. Whiteguru ( talk) 12:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - there seems to be some coverage in third party sources. PeepleLikeYou ( talk) 06:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or Draftify This seems WP:TOOSOON. This website doesn't seem like it has been around for long and it might end up not lasting very long, meaning that the coverage of its creation drama would fall under WP:ONEEVENT. ★Trekker ( talk) 18:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.