The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 03:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
As WP:USEFUL as this software may be, it is not notable -- it lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications. The sources currently being cited are blogs and chat forums. JBsupreme ( talk) 13:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 03:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
As WP:USEFUL as this software may be, it is not notable -- it lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications. The sources currently being cited are blogs and chat forums. JBsupreme ( talk) 13:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC) reply