- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
SuJon Berries
- SuJon Berries ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional. Mr. Guye ( talk) 00:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - and? What's your reason related to deletion criteria for deleting this evidently notable company? In ictu oculi ( talk) 11:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom, appears (self-)promotional. Fails WP:SIGCOV. 2 links to their own website, 1 to a blog and 1 to an offline source which cannot be checked for depth of coverage. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 04:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete nothing around to suggest notability NealeFamily ( talk) 03:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not sufficiently notable. Almost worth a speedy for unambiguous advertising. QuiteUnusual ( talk) 13:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
SuJon Berries
- SuJon Berries ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional. Mr. Guye ( talk) 00:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - and? What's your reason related to deletion criteria for deleting this evidently notable company? In ictu oculi ( talk) 11:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom, appears (self-)promotional. Fails WP:SIGCOV. 2 links to their own website, 1 to a blog and 1 to an offline source which cannot be checked for depth of coverage. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 04:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete nothing around to suggest notability NealeFamily ( talk) 03:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not sufficiently notable. Almost worth a speedy for unambiguous advertising. QuiteUnusual ( talk) 13:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.