The result was keep. Sr 13 03:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC) reply
entire article is a violation of WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:MADEUP, WP:NEO, etc. the closing admin of the last afd violated WP:JUSTAVOTE since most of the keep arguments presented are violations of WP:NOR and therefore should be ignored. the most compelling argument for keeping is the Forbes reference, and that lone reference isn't enough. Andy Greenberg - the author of the Forbes article - doesn't get to violate WP:MADEUP and WP:NEO any more then any one here does. plus, it seems very likely that this Andy Greenberg based his Forbes article off of this wikipedia article. if a mainstream source uses an article violating WP:NOR as its source, the wikipedia article doesn't, all of a sudden, magically become justified. Misterdiscreet 19:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC) reply
strong keep -- this is a phenomenon in propaganda that is worth documenting. The timeline is stellar. Gregbard 01:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment Did somebody notice the recursive irony of this AfD? The article Streisand effect potentially might be hit by the Streisand effect itself -- if the NOR'ers get their way and remove it, there's already enough following to take it out of Wikipedia and spread it all around :D -- Wesha 15:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Sr 13 03:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC) reply
entire article is a violation of WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:MADEUP, WP:NEO, etc. the closing admin of the last afd violated WP:JUSTAVOTE since most of the keep arguments presented are violations of WP:NOR and therefore should be ignored. the most compelling argument for keeping is the Forbes reference, and that lone reference isn't enough. Andy Greenberg - the author of the Forbes article - doesn't get to violate WP:MADEUP and WP:NEO any more then any one here does. plus, it seems very likely that this Andy Greenberg based his Forbes article off of this wikipedia article. if a mainstream source uses an article violating WP:NOR as its source, the wikipedia article doesn't, all of a sudden, magically become justified. Misterdiscreet 19:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC) reply
strong keep -- this is a phenomenon in propaganda that is worth documenting. The timeline is stellar. Gregbard 01:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment Did somebody notice the recursive irony of this AfD? The article Streisand effect potentially might be hit by the Streisand effect itself -- if the NOR'ers get their way and remove it, there's already enough following to take it out of Wikipedia and spread it all around :D -- Wesha 15:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC) reply