From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Strange Prison

Strange Prison (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - After the AfD, editors have added some pretty in-depth reviews to indicate that the album has achieved coverage from multiple independent and reliable sources. With a cursory search I found another possibility: [1]. The nominator could have found these easily during the WP:BEFORE process. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 22:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. There are enough references to in-depth reviews in major WP:GNG-assisting publications to pass the "notability because critical attention" criterion. An album that was referenceable only to blog and zine reviews wouldn't pass that, but an album that has been singled out for attention by CBC Music and Exclaim! and the Calgary Herald most certainly does (especially because a feature on CBC Music also inherently portends the album going into rotation on a national radio network and thus passing NMUSIC #11.) Bearcat ( talk) 17:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Keep: Hard to argue with the reliability of the references. Otr500 ( talk) 03:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Strange Prison

Strange Prison (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - After the AfD, editors have added some pretty in-depth reviews to indicate that the album has achieved coverage from multiple independent and reliable sources. With a cursory search I found another possibility: [1]. The nominator could have found these easily during the WP:BEFORE process. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 22:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. There are enough references to in-depth reviews in major WP:GNG-assisting publications to pass the "notability because critical attention" criterion. An album that was referenceable only to blog and zine reviews wouldn't pass that, but an album that has been singled out for attention by CBC Music and Exclaim! and the Calgary Herald most certainly does (especially because a feature on CBC Music also inherently portends the album going into rotation on a national radio network and thus passing NMUSIC #11.) Bearcat ( talk) 17:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Keep: Hard to argue with the reliability of the references. Otr500 ( talk) 03:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook