The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Duplicate of previously deleted article; fails WP:GNG and doesn't satisfy any listed item for WP:NARTIST. (For reference, here is the previous deletion dicussion [1]). The article subject is an anonymous twitter artist. As noted in the previous deletion discussion and in WP:BEFORE, the most substantive citations are the same articles from the The Daily Dot [2] [3] referencing reddit and twitter posts. Per WP:RSP and previous deletion discussion, The Daily Dot is of dubious credibility. Of the other sources that might satisfy WP:SIGCOV, is a Bitcoin.com article [4] heavily referencing the subject's twitter account (and a similar article [5] seemingly written by a non-English speaker or A.I.). The remaining sources give passing mention to the subject and are also exclusively social media focused. GoggleGoose ( talk) 16:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Duplicate of previously deleted article; fails WP:GNG and doesn't satisfy any listed item for WP:NARTIST. (For reference, here is the previous deletion dicussion [1]). The article subject is an anonymous twitter artist. As noted in the previous deletion discussion and in WP:BEFORE, the most substantive citations are the same articles from the The Daily Dot [2] [3] referencing reddit and twitter posts. Per WP:RSP and previous deletion discussion, The Daily Dot is of dubious credibility. Of the other sources that might satisfy WP:SIGCOV, is a Bitcoin.com article [4] heavily referencing the subject's twitter account (and a similar article [5] seemingly written by a non-English speaker or A.I.). The remaining sources give passing mention to the subject and are also exclusively social media focused. GoggleGoose ( talk) 16:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)