- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Monty 845 20:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Stichtse Vrije School ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find anything relevant here. This is just a average school in a small town in The Netherlands. The only source seems te be the own website. There are no independent sources given. So why is this school relevant enough for it's own article? Natuur12 ( talk) 08:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete unless WP:NSCHOOL can be satisfied. I haven't found anything interesting on GNews or DDG. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 10:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Secondary schools are notable by long-standing precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:ORGSIG states that no organization - including schools - has inherent notability. To warrant an article, a school needs to meet WP:NSCHOOL or some other notability criterion. The Parson's Cat ( talk) 16:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 14:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 14:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per longstanding precedent and consensus regarding Wikipedia articles about secondary schools. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Wikipedia:Notability (high schools) for more context. Northamerica1000 (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - mainstream established secondary school per longstanding precedent as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Needs expanding per WP:WPSCH/AG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as a high school. No reason to think that sources cannot be found to meet WP:ORG. We keep high schools for very good reasons; not only do they influence the lives of thousands of people but they also play a significant part in their communities. Expansion not deletion is the way to go with such stubs. Amongst other things, searches need to be carried out on Dutch and local sources. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 04:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Monty 845 20:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Stichtse Vrije School ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find anything relevant here. This is just a average school in a small town in The Netherlands. The only source seems te be the own website. There are no independent sources given. So why is this school relevant enough for it's own article? Natuur12 ( talk) 08:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete unless WP:NSCHOOL can be satisfied. I haven't found anything interesting on GNews or DDG. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 10:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Secondary schools are notable by long-standing precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:ORGSIG states that no organization - including schools - has inherent notability. To warrant an article, a school needs to meet WP:NSCHOOL or some other notability criterion. The Parson's Cat ( talk) 16:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 14:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 14:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per longstanding precedent and consensus regarding Wikipedia articles about secondary schools. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Wikipedia:Notability (high schools) for more context. Northamerica1000 (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - mainstream established secondary school per longstanding precedent as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Needs expanding per WP:WPSCH/AG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as a high school. No reason to think that sources cannot be found to meet WP:ORG. We keep high schools for very good reasons; not only do they influence the lives of thousands of people but they also play a significant part in their communities. Expansion not deletion is the way to go with such stubs. Amongst other things, searches need to be carried out on Dutch and local sources. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 04:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.