From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) The World's Signature ( talk) 01:38, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Status Labs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company appears to be mostly notable for Wiki-PR editing of Wikipedia, so, after digging into it more, I think it should be redirected there. The World's Signature ( talk) 21:17, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 22:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 22:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 22:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Hi Bakazaka, I guess I should have explained myself more. I don't have any direct connection to Status Labs apart from the fact that I live in Austin and found the company interesting based on that. It was not my intent to promote them when I did my initial edits, merely wanted to bring the page up to what other Wiki pages for companies look like. The reason I decided to nomniate the page for deletion is because there was a notability tag added to the article by a more experienced user after my edits. If the page is going to be a short paragraph, seems to me it'd be more appropriate to have it as a section on Wiki-PR editing of Wikipedia rather than its own page. The World's Signature ( talk) 00:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your reply. So, to clarify, you're proposing a merge? There is no Status Labs content at your proposed target currently. Bakazaka ( talk) 00:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Yes, precisely. Create a section labeled Status Labs there and move the existing content over. The World's Signature ( talk) 01:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
In that case you should withdraw this AfD nomination, and follow WP:MERGEPROP instructions instead. Bakazaka ( talk) 01:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Ah! Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. The World's Signature ( talk) 01:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) The World's Signature ( talk) 01:38, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Status Labs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company appears to be mostly notable for Wiki-PR editing of Wikipedia, so, after digging into it more, I think it should be redirected there. The World's Signature ( talk) 21:17, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 22:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 22:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 22:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Hi Bakazaka, I guess I should have explained myself more. I don't have any direct connection to Status Labs apart from the fact that I live in Austin and found the company interesting based on that. It was not my intent to promote them when I did my initial edits, merely wanted to bring the page up to what other Wiki pages for companies look like. The reason I decided to nomniate the page for deletion is because there was a notability tag added to the article by a more experienced user after my edits. If the page is going to be a short paragraph, seems to me it'd be more appropriate to have it as a section on Wiki-PR editing of Wikipedia rather than its own page. The World's Signature ( talk) 00:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your reply. So, to clarify, you're proposing a merge? There is no Status Labs content at your proposed target currently. Bakazaka ( talk) 00:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Yes, precisely. Create a section labeled Status Labs there and move the existing content over. The World's Signature ( talk) 01:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
In that case you should withdraw this AfD nomination, and follow WP:MERGEPROP instructions instead. Bakazaka ( talk) 01:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Ah! Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. The World's Signature ( talk) 01:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook