The result was redirect to Dospey Heights. The nomination contends that GEOLAND is not met because no "information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist". The "keep" opinions therefore would have had to rebut that argument by referencing such information, but they have not done so. Content can be merged from the history as appropriate. Sandstein 17:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
While this does meet WP:GEOLAND #4 as a named geographical feature, no information beyond statistics and coordinates are known to exist. The summit is already mentioned in its parent feature Dospey Heights, and so deletion rather than merger appears to be the better option. BilledMammal ( talk) 04:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dospey Heights. The nomination contends that GEOLAND is not met because no "information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist". The "keep" opinions therefore would have had to rebut that argument by referencing such information, but they have not done so. Content can be merged from the history as appropriate. Sandstein 17:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
While this does meet WP:GEOLAND #4 as a named geographical feature, no information beyond statistics and coordinates are known to exist. The summit is already mentioned in its parent feature Dospey Heights, and so deletion rather than merger appears to be the better option. BilledMammal ( talk) 04:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)