The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Procedural nom. This was {{prod}} tagged and deleted as part of
User:Oo7565's random-deletion-tagging spree. This appears to be a potentially noteworthy band, so I've undeleted and set up a procedural AFD discussion. Procedural nom, so I abstain. – iridescent 22:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
*Delete Fails
WP:N and
WP:Music. One album in 1970; no evidence it was a success.
Edison (
talk) 23:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Procedural nom. This was {{prod}} tagged and deleted as part of
User:Oo7565's random-deletion-tagging spree. This appears to be a potentially noteworthy band, so I've undeleted and set up a procedural AFD discussion. Procedural nom, so I abstain. – iridescent 22:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
*Delete Fails
WP:N and
WP:Music. One album in 1970; no evidence it was a success.
Edison (
talk) 23:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.