The result was no consensus, default to keep since deletion obviously isn't the correct outcome. Whether the article should be merged to Pez is now beyond the remit of AfD. Der yck C. 16:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply
No assertion of WP:GNG. While cited sources verify the existence of the line, they do not offer significant, focused discussion of impact, relevance, etc. -- EEMIV ( talk) 16:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, default to keep since deletion obviously isn't the correct outcome. Whether the article should be merged to Pez is now beyond the remit of AfD. Der yck C. 16:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply
No assertion of WP:GNG. While cited sources verify the existence of the line, they do not offer significant, focused discussion of impact, relevance, etc. -- EEMIV ( talk) 16:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply