From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of soft drinks by country#Italy. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 23:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Stappj (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Has one source, and written so far from encyclopaedic that even if found notable, would need to be WP:TNTed. Boleyn ( talk) 13:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Which part of it specifically is not notable? -- Rockysantos ( talk) 14:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Rockysantos, all articles can be improved, but that doesn't make their topics notable (and it's not like this hasn't been given any time, it's over 11 years old). How do you think this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG? Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 20:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I encourage people to invest the next week in researching and evaluating sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  15:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of soft drinks by country#Italy. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 23:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Stappj (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Has one source, and written so far from encyclopaedic that even if found notable, would need to be WP:TNTed. Boleyn ( talk) 13:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Which part of it specifically is not notable? -- Rockysantos ( talk) 14:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Rockysantos, all articles can be improved, but that doesn't make their topics notable (and it's not like this hasn't been given any time, it's over 11 years old). How do you think this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG? Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 20:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I encourage people to invest the next week in researching and evaluating sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  15:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook