The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep I added some basic historical information and references and I think the article satisfies GNG. I'm not totally opposed to merging to
Standon, Hertfordshire if people think the additional context would benefit the reader, but that is a conversation that can happen outside of AfD.
24.151.116.12 (
talk)
17:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
If the AFD is closed as keep, then there will have to be consensus to merge, it can't just be boldly done if this is closed as "keep". I agree maybe it should be merged, I was tempted to say that but because of the tertiary sources I though it might be OK as a separate article. Crouch, Swale (
talk)
18:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Thanks for expanding it, if the AFD is closed as "no consensus" or something like keep but a merge can be done, then it could still probably be boldly merged. I would be happy with a close of "keep" or "merge", or similar. Crouch, Swale (
talk)
19:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - I'm not sure this is the most reliable source, but here is a paper about it: Brown, J. A.
The Standon Hospice, Transactions of the East Hertfordshire Archaeological Society, Volume 1, East Hertfordshire Archaeological Society Stephen Austin & Sons, 1901 p289-291.
Smmurphy(
Talk)20:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep -- a preceptor of the Hospitallers is the equivalent of a priory in other orders. We normally regard all pre-Reformation British monasteries as notable. The article (though short) is well-sourced.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
18:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep I added some basic historical information and references and I think the article satisfies GNG. I'm not totally opposed to merging to
Standon, Hertfordshire if people think the additional context would benefit the reader, but that is a conversation that can happen outside of AfD.
24.151.116.12 (
talk)
17:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
If the AFD is closed as keep, then there will have to be consensus to merge, it can't just be boldly done if this is closed as "keep". I agree maybe it should be merged, I was tempted to say that but because of the tertiary sources I though it might be OK as a separate article. Crouch, Swale (
talk)
18:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Thanks for expanding it, if the AFD is closed as "no consensus" or something like keep but a merge can be done, then it could still probably be boldly merged. I would be happy with a close of "keep" or "merge", or similar. Crouch, Swale (
talk)
19:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - I'm not sure this is the most reliable source, but here is a paper about it: Brown, J. A.
The Standon Hospice, Transactions of the East Hertfordshire Archaeological Society, Volume 1, East Hertfordshire Archaeological Society Stephen Austin & Sons, 1901 p289-291.
Smmurphy(
Talk)20:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep -- a preceptor of the Hospitallers is the equivalent of a priory in other orders. We normally regard all pre-Reformation British monasteries as notable. The article (though short) is well-sourced.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
18:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.