- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Modussiccandi ( talk) 08:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Standards-compliant
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Standards-compliant ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are hundreds if not thousands of standards in use around the world (see Standard). This article simply talks about Web standards. Furthermore, the article is wrong- the W3C doesn't maintain the HTML standard anymore. Finally, why bother having an Anything-compliant article at all? If there's a standard, then I think we can assume anything relevant to that standard is compliant or not. Sean Brunnock ( talk) 18:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 3. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- The noun form would be standards-compliance in any case. A rename to standards-compliant WWW browser would solve the "But what standard?" question. But quirks mode seems to cover the subject better. Uncle G ( talk) 20:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete To begin with, there are lots of standards to which one must/should comply that are not web standards, as per Uncle G. Oddly, the article on web browser is pretty thin - I expected to see more there about standards and compliance. In any case, I would suggest adding some text and sources to that article before creating a stand-alone article on compliance. Lamona ( talk) 17:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Modussiccandi ( talk) 08:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Standards-compliant
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Standards-compliant ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are hundreds if not thousands of standards in use around the world (see Standard). This article simply talks about Web standards. Furthermore, the article is wrong- the W3C doesn't maintain the HTML standard anymore. Finally, why bother having an Anything-compliant article at all? If there's a standard, then I think we can assume anything relevant to that standard is compliant or not. Sean Brunnock ( talk) 18:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 3. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 18:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- The noun form would be standards-compliance in any case. A rename to standards-compliant WWW browser would solve the "But what standard?" question. But quirks mode seems to cover the subject better. Uncle G ( talk) 20:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete To begin with, there are lots of standards to which one must/should comply that are not web standards, as per Uncle G. Oddly, the article on web browser is pretty thin - I expected to see more there about standards and compliance. In any case, I would suggest adding some text and sources to that article before creating a stand-alone article on compliance. Lamona ( talk) 17:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.