The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 21:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)reply
A competitor in beauty pageants who placed third on one of only two national competitions she competed in, and did not place in the other. No sources other than in the context of the pageants. Aside from the usual issues of objectifying women, this article has nothing to show notability of the subject. Guy (
help!) 19:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete state titles are not enough on their own to confer notability, and the sourcing is not enough to show notability either.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 16:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk) 18:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete with respect to
Bearian, I don't think we need to worry about wins or not. This is a complete
WP:GNG fail. There's literally noreliable, independent source coverage about this beauty pageant contest that is both in-depth and at-length. So, per that and per nom, it's a delete.
Doug MehusT·C 02:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. No coverage whatsoever. As for being a contestant, I couldn't find any specific notability guidelines referring to beauty contestants. Even the relevant WikiProject isn't sure. Therefore I think there are no grounds for deeming her notable.
PK650 (
talk) 04:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 21:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)reply
A competitor in beauty pageants who placed third on one of only two national competitions she competed in, and did not place in the other. No sources other than in the context of the pageants. Aside from the usual issues of objectifying women, this article has nothing to show notability of the subject. Guy (
help!) 19:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete state titles are not enough on their own to confer notability, and the sourcing is not enough to show notability either.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 16:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk) 18:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete with respect to
Bearian, I don't think we need to worry about wins or not. This is a complete
WP:GNG fail. There's literally noreliable, independent source coverage about this beauty pageant contest that is both in-depth and at-length. So, per that and per nom, it's a delete.
Doug MehusT·C 02:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. No coverage whatsoever. As for being a contestant, I couldn't find any specific notability guidelines referring to beauty contestants. Even the relevant WikiProject isn't sure. Therefore I think there are no grounds for deeming her notable.
PK650 (
talk) 04:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.