The result was redirect to Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland. ( non-admin closure) → Σ τ c. 00:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I've been mulling over this for awhile, and have decided to go through with it. This school has been to AfD once before at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. David School; it was several years ago and "No consensus" was the result. Since then, we've gotten tougher on verifibility, and a firmer consensus has emerged about the notability of schools. This is a non-secondary school (K-8), and it's generally held that only secondary schools are notable. The only exceptions are if a school is award-winning or has a wide depth of coverage. This has neither. It lacks reliable sources; the only sources it has are from its own website, and a fleeting mention of the school in a book that pays mention to the school's janitor (there is a chapter devoted to the janitor, but almost all of it focuses on his contributions aside of St. David). Bottom line: This article's in a gots-to-go situation Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 01:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland. ( non-admin closure) → Σ τ c. 00:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I've been mulling over this for awhile, and have decided to go through with it. This school has been to AfD once before at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. David School; it was several years ago and "No consensus" was the result. Since then, we've gotten tougher on verifibility, and a firmer consensus has emerged about the notability of schools. This is a non-secondary school (K-8), and it's generally held that only secondary schools are notable. The only exceptions are if a school is award-winning or has a wide depth of coverage. This has neither. It lacks reliable sources; the only sources it has are from its own website, and a fleeting mention of the school in a book that pays mention to the school's janitor (there is a chapter devoted to the janitor, but almost all of it focuses on his contributions aside of St. David). Bottom line: This article's in a gots-to-go situation Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 01:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply