- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Thanks everyone who contributed to the discussion. If you are not happy with the decision, please bring it up here. Missvain ( talk) 14:47, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple
- Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence provided as to why this temple is notable. PROD was removed. Black Kite (talk) 22:14, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Spaceman Spiff 17:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Article would need to be wholly re-written and sourced by an editor for me to change my mind. Sulfurboy ( talk) 22:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - It should also be noted there has been vandal issues on this page that maintenance templates have been repeatedly removed. Sulfurboy ( talk) 22:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Numerous attempts have been made to work with the author, but no communication has gotten through. As of now, this article looks like a picture book, no an encyclopedic article. I had added a PROD a few days ago, but it was removed by the author. Garchy ( talk) 23:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - per WP:NOT, WP:NOTABLE and WP:VERIFY. In it's current state, as Garchy said, an un-sourced (or poorly sourced) picture book or photo album with little encyclopaedic value without explanatory text. The editor has been blocked [1] for 24 hours per my report for edit warring over the maintenance templates. Nb I have been editing that page and put lots of message on the editor's talk page, so have a bit of a COI! - 220 of Borg 05:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Thanks everyone who contributed to the discussion. If you are not happy with the decision, please bring it up here. Missvain ( talk) 14:47, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple
- Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence provided as to why this temple is notable. PROD was removed. Black Kite (talk) 22:14, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Spaceman Spiff 17:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Article would need to be wholly re-written and sourced by an editor for me to change my mind. Sulfurboy ( talk) 22:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - It should also be noted there has been vandal issues on this page that maintenance templates have been repeatedly removed. Sulfurboy ( talk) 22:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Numerous attempts have been made to work with the author, but no communication has gotten through. As of now, this article looks like a picture book, no an encyclopedic article. I had added a PROD a few days ago, but it was removed by the author. Garchy ( talk) 23:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - per WP:NOT, WP:NOTABLE and WP:VERIFY. In it's current state, as Garchy said, an un-sourced (or poorly sourced) picture book or photo album with little encyclopaedic value without explanatory text. The editor has been blocked [1] for 24 hours per my report for edit warring over the maintenance templates. Nb I have been editing that page and put lots of message on the editor's talk page, so have a bit of a COI! - 220 of Borg 05:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.