- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Sri Lanka Air Force. Sandstein 09:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sri Lanka Air Force Special Air Borne Force ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, confused article. SABF is referred to exactly once on the Sri Lanka Air Force's own (quite detailed) web site. SABF appears to be a course that Air Force soldiers can take. SABF is not mentioned on Sri Lanka Air Force or any of its sub-pages. Delete unless it can be sourced with coverage from reliable sources. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. I believe we generally keep top-level commando units - even if they are small units. In this case this unit is the top-level airborne force (the air-force also has a Sri Lanka Air Force Regiment (and Sri Lanka Air Force Regiment Special Force) which focus on air-base defense) - which is tasked with VIP / counter-terror / covert ops. Sources do exist, e.g. - [1] [2] [3]. (+ seems there is coverage every time a training course is completed - often in conjunction with other units). Icewhiz ( talk) 07:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. With the sources and information identified by Icewhiz and bearing in mind WP:CSB, I think there is enough here for an article that is suitable for Wikipedia. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with the Sri Lanka Air Force page - FOX 52 ( talk) 06:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 14:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 14:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Tendency towards a merge with Sri Lanka Air Force. The shorter article is not too long for a merge to take place and it is currently labelled as an orphaned article. Vorbee ( talk) 16:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with Sri Lanka Air Force, mostly due to the article's length. If it has been expanded further then we can have the standalone article again. Lorstaking ( talk) 04:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Sri Lanka Air Force. Sandstein 09:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sri Lanka Air Force Special Air Borne Force ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, confused article. SABF is referred to exactly once on the Sri Lanka Air Force's own (quite detailed) web site. SABF appears to be a course that Air Force soldiers can take. SABF is not mentioned on Sri Lanka Air Force or any of its sub-pages. Delete unless it can be sourced with coverage from reliable sources. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. I believe we generally keep top-level commando units - even if they are small units. In this case this unit is the top-level airborne force (the air-force also has a Sri Lanka Air Force Regiment (and Sri Lanka Air Force Regiment Special Force) which focus on air-base defense) - which is tasked with VIP / counter-terror / covert ops. Sources do exist, e.g. - [1] [2] [3]. (+ seems there is coverage every time a training course is completed - often in conjunction with other units). Icewhiz ( talk) 07:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. With the sources and information identified by Icewhiz and bearing in mind WP:CSB, I think there is enough here for an article that is suitable for Wikipedia. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with the Sri Lanka Air Force page - FOX 52 ( talk) 06:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 14:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 14:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Tendency towards a merge with Sri Lanka Air Force. The shorter article is not too long for a merge to take place and it is currently labelled as an orphaned article. Vorbee ( talk) 16:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with Sri Lanka Air Force, mostly due to the article's length. If it has been expanded further then we can have the standalone article again. Lorstaking ( talk) 04:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.