The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, a
search of Google Books indicates chapter-length coverage in a variety of publications, satisfying
WP:GEOLAND's requirement of "information beyond statistics and coordinates" for named natural features. I've added one ref (being the one the fickle Google Gods saw fit to give me access to) that verified most of the article's existing content, and could be used for further expansion.
Antepenultimate (
talk)
19:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Thank you to Antepenultimate for adding the ref and developing the article. It's a tourist attraction, which pretty much makes it notable (no need for angry notes that that is not literally the policy, for whatever reason). --
doncram23:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, a
search of Google Books indicates chapter-length coverage in a variety of publications, satisfying
WP:GEOLAND's requirement of "information beyond statistics and coordinates" for named natural features. I've added one ref (being the one the fickle Google Gods saw fit to give me access to) that verified most of the article's existing content, and could be used for further expansion.
Antepenultimate (
talk)
19:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Thank you to Antepenultimate for adding the ref and developing the article. It's a tourist attraction, which pretty much makes it notable (no need for angry notes that that is not literally the policy, for whatever reason). --
doncram23:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.