From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 05:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Spontaneous Saturday (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be notable per WP:TVSHOW, and likely fails general WP:N. Additionally, I can't seem to locate any reliable sources. --Animalparty-- ( talk) 01:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment, programme was real (see here), although only two episodes seem to have been produced. SBS is a national television network so it seems it would meet WP:TVSHOW, but I can't find any reliable sources of substance to describe it, so it might not meet the WP:GNG. Will have to think about this one. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 12:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC). reply
    • On further consideration and after looking for sources only to draw a blank, I'm going to go with saying this doesn't meet WP:GNG and should be deleted. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 07:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC). reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 06:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC) reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 01:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete I think the relevant part of WP:TVSHOW here is "a national television program may not be notable if it was cancelled too quickly to have garnered any significant media coverage." The only thing I can find is this from the TV Tonight blog, which is definitely not enough to establish notability. The programme is recent enough that if there were other media reviews, they would be easy enough to pick up through a quick search. Moswento talky 08:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 05:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Spontaneous Saturday (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be notable per WP:TVSHOW, and likely fails general WP:N. Additionally, I can't seem to locate any reliable sources. --Animalparty-- ( talk) 01:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment, programme was real (see here), although only two episodes seem to have been produced. SBS is a national television network so it seems it would meet WP:TVSHOW, but I can't find any reliable sources of substance to describe it, so it might not meet the WP:GNG. Will have to think about this one. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 12:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC). reply
    • On further consideration and after looking for sources only to draw a blank, I'm going to go with saying this doesn't meet WP:GNG and should be deleted. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 07:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC). reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 06:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC) reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 01:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete I think the relevant part of WP:TVSHOW here is "a national television program may not be notable if it was cancelled too quickly to have garnered any significant media coverage." The only thing I can find is this from the TV Tonight blog, which is definitely not enough to establish notability. The programme is recent enough that if there were other media reviews, they would be easy enough to pick up through a quick search. Moswento talky 08:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook