The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
RL0919 (
talk) 17:15, 23 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Non notable, gamecruft item that fails GNG.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable. Definitely not "essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry."
Tangurena (
talk) 01:43, 17 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Let this article be fed into its subject.
Rockphed (
talk) 16:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
RL0919 (
talk) 17:15, 23 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Non notable, gamecruft item that fails GNG.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 23:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable. Definitely not "essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry."
Tangurena (
talk) 01:43, 17 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Let this article be fed into its subject.
Rockphed (
talk) 16:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.