The result was no consensus to delete at this time. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 18:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable winery. Tagged for notability months ago. Tag was removed, and a reference to Wines & Vines was added. However, a profile written up in Wines & Vines does not confer notability; it's just a profile that says nothing special about the winery that couldn't also apply to hundreds of other non-notable start-ups. Article prod removed, now going to AfD. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 23:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment from nominator regarding WP:CORP: The crux of the issue involves a single article in a trade magazine about the subject winery. WP:CORP specifically requires sources (plural), not a single source. Also, trade magazines tend to lack sufficient independence of the subject because they depend on the organizations they cover for support. Therefore, "keep" arguments err when they rely on a single quasi-independent source as sufficient to establish notability. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 18:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus to delete at this time. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 18:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable winery. Tagged for notability months ago. Tag was removed, and a reference to Wines & Vines was added. However, a profile written up in Wines & Vines does not confer notability; it's just a profile that says nothing special about the winery that couldn't also apply to hundreds of other non-notable start-ups. Article prod removed, now going to AfD. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 23:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment from nominator regarding WP:CORP: The crux of the issue involves a single article in a trade magazine about the subject winery. WP:CORP specifically requires sources (plural), not a single source. Also, trade magazines tend to lack sufficient independence of the subject because they depend on the organizations they cover for support. Therefore, "keep" arguments err when they rely on a single quasi-independent source as sufficient to establish notability. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 18:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply