The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Per the evidence of notability provided. Mergers and the like can be discussed elsewhere.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Spectrum magazine is hardly a notable resource almost all of the sources link to the website also spectrum magazine does not get much coverage
Jonnymoon96 (
talk) 01:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)reply
I would agree this article also does not meet notability requirements, what is the next step?...
Simbagraphix (
talk) 11:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
well first off i am thankful you are here to discuss this
since there is not much discussion i will probably add the speedy delete template--
Jonnymoon96 (
talk) 22:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: relisted in the hope of discussion DGG (
talk ) 04:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DGG (
talk ) 04:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Weak keep. The significance of this publication in Adventist circles seems to be substantiated by the source in the second footnote.
[1] As such it passes
Wikipedia:Notability (media)#Newspapers, magazines and journals. Of course it would be a stronger demonstration of notability if there were more than one independent source cited for the proposition. --
Arxiloxos (
talk) 05:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Wrong forum As a split from another article, a notability concern for this topic does not need admin tools; and as per
WP:Deletion policy#CONTENT, content discussions at AfD should be moved to a proper forum. Note that the fourth snippet in WP:BEFORE D1 Google news is from the Washington Post in 2015 and states, "...the independent, progressive-leaning Adventist magazine Spectrum."
Unscintillating (
talk) 03:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Per the evidence of notability provided. Mergers and the like can be discussed elsewhere.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Spectrum magazine is hardly a notable resource almost all of the sources link to the website also spectrum magazine does not get much coverage
Jonnymoon96 (
talk) 01:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)reply
I would agree this article also does not meet notability requirements, what is the next step?...
Simbagraphix (
talk) 11:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
well first off i am thankful you are here to discuss this
since there is not much discussion i will probably add the speedy delete template--
Jonnymoon96 (
talk) 22:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: relisted in the hope of discussion DGG (
talk ) 04:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DGG (
talk ) 04:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Weak keep. The significance of this publication in Adventist circles seems to be substantiated by the source in the second footnote.
[1] As such it passes
Wikipedia:Notability (media)#Newspapers, magazines and journals. Of course it would be a stronger demonstration of notability if there were more than one independent source cited for the proposition. --
Arxiloxos (
talk) 05:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Wrong forum As a split from another article, a notability concern for this topic does not need admin tools; and as per
WP:Deletion policy#CONTENT, content discussions at AfD should be moved to a proper forum. Note that the fourth snippet in WP:BEFORE D1 Google news is from the Washington Post in 2015 and states, "...the independent, progressive-leaning Adventist magazine Spectrum."
Unscintillating (
talk) 03:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.