From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem ( talk) 00:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Spatial hub (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 17:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete this is a non-notable website. The name should be "Scottish Spatial Data Infrastructure" if it is kept and discuss the entire initiative, not just the web portal. Power~enwiki ( talk) 21:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Do not delete The "Scottish Spatial Data Infrastructure" is something completely different and is a website owned and managed by the Scottish Government. It is only a metadata register of all publically available spatial data in Scotland. The Spatial Hub (owned, run and managed by the Improvement Service) is THE portal for Scottish Local Authorities to update their actual data and for registered users to access the national data via a WMS/WFS url. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.147.94.161 ( talk) 13:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete too specific to ever become notable; fails WP:GNG. We should first have an article on the "Improvement Service" ( homepage) if they are notable. -- Bejnar ( talk) 19:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem ( talk) 00:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Spatial hub (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 17:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete this is a non-notable website. The name should be "Scottish Spatial Data Infrastructure" if it is kept and discuss the entire initiative, not just the web portal. Power~enwiki ( talk) 21:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Do not delete The "Scottish Spatial Data Infrastructure" is something completely different and is a website owned and managed by the Scottish Government. It is only a metadata register of all publically available spatial data in Scotland. The Spatial Hub (owned, run and managed by the Improvement Service) is THE portal for Scottish Local Authorities to update their actual data and for registered users to access the national data via a WMS/WFS url. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.147.94.161 ( talk) 13:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete too specific to ever become notable; fails WP:GNG. We should first have an article on the "Improvement Service" ( homepage) if they are notable. -- Bejnar ( talk) 19:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook