The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Any redirect is a separate editorial decision. Sandstein 20:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Notability not established. Sources include the inventor's homepage, their doctoral thesis, and a forum; the only additional source I could find is a
paper in an off-track conference that has garnered three citations according to GScholar.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 07:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Modified my vote to suggest redirection rather than deletion, as I didn't realize at the time that we had this list. I think it's better to give readers some idea of where it's used and what supports it.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 08:48, 3 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now as I found nothing better than a few links at Books and browser.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Intgr: as far as I can tell from a
quick GScholar search, crash counting was invented by the author of SpadFS, prototyped in that system, and not more notable.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 08:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The Linux Mag source that you added to
crash counting could be used to establish some collective notability for SpadFS and crash counting (although I would then redirect crash counting to SpadFS).
NinjaRobotPirate rejected that, but probably didn't see the PDF version.
CerealKillerYum,
CoffeeWithMarkets,
Kierzek, did you consider that source?
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 08:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
I am not impressed, but would agree that if consensus feels that
crash counting is notable enough (and it is barely a stub), then this could be merged with it; otherwise, delete.
Kierzek (
talk) 11:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep as it is independently sourced and merge
crash counting with it if it's only used in this
filesystem.
LjL (
talk) 12:23, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
WP:GNG states that "multiple sources are generally expected" — we currently have only one secondary source.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 12:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Any redirect is a separate editorial decision. Sandstein 20:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Notability not established. Sources include the inventor's homepage, their doctoral thesis, and a forum; the only additional source I could find is a
paper in an off-track conference that has garnered three citations according to GScholar.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 07:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Modified my vote to suggest redirection rather than deletion, as I didn't realize at the time that we had this list. I think it's better to give readers some idea of where it's used and what supports it.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 08:48, 3 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now as I found nothing better than a few links at Books and browser.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Intgr: as far as I can tell from a
quick GScholar search, crash counting was invented by the author of SpadFS, prototyped in that system, and not more notable.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 08:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The Linux Mag source that you added to
crash counting could be used to establish some collective notability for SpadFS and crash counting (although I would then redirect crash counting to SpadFS).
NinjaRobotPirate rejected that, but probably didn't see the PDF version.
CerealKillerYum,
CoffeeWithMarkets,
Kierzek, did you consider that source?
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 08:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
I am not impressed, but would agree that if consensus feels that
crash counting is notable enough (and it is barely a stub), then this could be merged with it; otherwise, delete.
Kierzek (
talk) 11:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep as it is independently sourced and merge
crash counting with it if it's only used in this
filesystem.
LjL (
talk) 12:23, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
WP:GNG states that "multiple sources are generally expected" — we currently have only one secondary source.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 12:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.