The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (
talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:WEB and
WP:V: non-notable browser game with no references based on reliable, published sources.
Wyatt Riot (
talk) 23:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Pure promotional fluff for a non-notable game.
Uncle Dick (
talk) 17:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete, no evidence or indication of notability. PKT(alk) 21:33, 5 November 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (
talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:WEB and
WP:V: non-notable browser game with no references based on reliable, published sources.
Wyatt Riot (
talk) 23:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Pure promotional fluff for a non-notable game.
Uncle Dick (
talk) 17:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete, no evidence or indication of notability. PKT(alk) 21:33, 5 November 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.