- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock#Preserved steam locomotives. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Southern Pacific 1298
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Southern Pacific 1298 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find any coverage of this locomotive in secondary sources. The source used for basically the entire article is a self-published website. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and California. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. If this is not independently notable (I haven't looked for sources) it should be redirected to List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock#Preserved steam locomotives. If verifiable, the information in the article could be used to expand the entry there to a full sentence as that seems DUE based on other entries. I don't see any benefit in deletion over this course of action. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
*Delete. Per nom.
124.148.210.252 (
talk) 21:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:SOCKSTRIKE –
dudhhr
talk
contribssheher
22:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect per Thryduulf. News search found nothing and book search found self-published sources (and a few books with "Southern Pacific" on page 1298). – dudhhr talk contribssheher 22:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect as per Thryduulf would indeed be the best choice. TH1980 ( talk) 02:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock#Preserved steam locomotives. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Southern Pacific 1298
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Southern Pacific 1298 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find any coverage of this locomotive in secondary sources. The source used for basically the entire article is a self-published website. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and California. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. If this is not independently notable (I haven't looked for sources) it should be redirected to List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock#Preserved steam locomotives. If verifiable, the information in the article could be used to expand the entry there to a full sentence as that seems DUE based on other entries. I don't see any benefit in deletion over this course of action. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
*Delete. Per nom.
124.148.210.252 (
talk) 21:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:SOCKSTRIKE –
dudhhr
talk
contribssheher
22:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect per Thryduulf. News search found nothing and book search found self-published sources (and a few books with "Southern Pacific" on page 1298). – dudhhr talk contribssheher 22:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect as per Thryduulf would indeed be the best choice. TH1980 ( talk) 02:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.