The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Southern Oregon–Western Oregon football rivalry

Southern Oregon–Western Oregon football rivalry (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another creation of same editor. Both citations are currently dead, official site and CFB scores DB. Establishment of games results alone from a series is not sufficient for WP:GNG. UW Dawgs ( talk) 05:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Baby miss fortune} 05:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Baby miss fortune} 05:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Baby miss fortune} 05:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 06:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 06:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 30. — ^{cyberbot I} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment I don't think there are any Wikipedia articles about NAIA football rivalries, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't. I'm inclined to give this one a chance due to the history. Not ready to take a position just yet, want to see some more research. As it stands now, it doesn't look like the article itself supports WP:GNG but there likely is a good amount of offline historical sources that could be drummed up.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 22:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete -- does not meet notability guidelines and significant RS coverage not found. Basically, fancruft and trivia. No value to the project. K.e.coffman ( talk) 20:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - My searches (limited to on-line sources) did not turn up any significant coverage, let alone in multiple, reliable, and independent sources. The coverage is the key, but I find it telling as an aside that nobody has even bothered to create an article on the Western Oregon football program, and the overall article on the Western Oregon Wolves doesn't even discuss the football program. If the Western Oregon football program isn't important enough to motivate anyone to create a stand-alone article (or even a sentence discussion in the overall program article), then it's very doubtful that its "rivalry" with Southern Oregon warrants a stand-alone article. If examples of significant coverage were to be provided, I would consider changing my vote. Cbl62 ( talk) 17:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.