- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 14:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Song Recital
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Song Recital ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails all of the criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings. Softlavender ( talk) 20:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:39, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep – The referred guideline is a an advice on style in the form of an essay. Nominated for a Grammy, the album satisfies WP:NALBUM. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 01:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment and Keep per Michael Bednarek. The criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently be considered for removal for WP:NPOV concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at WP:ALBUM. 4meter4 ( talk) 18:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- the discussion about its suitability or otherwise is occurring here. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:NALBUM with multiple independent reviews that are included in the article. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:26, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issue has now been addressed - brief quotes from reviews will be supplied in due course. See Opera, July 2011, p. 870 for further discussion. Niggle1892 ( talk) 12:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 14:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Song Recital
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Song Recital ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails all of the criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings. Softlavender ( talk) 20:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:39, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep – The referred guideline is a an advice on style in the form of an essay. Nominated for a Grammy, the album satisfies WP:NALBUM. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 01:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment and Keep per Michael Bednarek. The criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently be considered for removal for WP:NPOV concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at WP:ALBUM. 4meter4 ( talk) 18:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- the discussion about its suitability or otherwise is occurring here. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:NALBUM with multiple independent reviews that are included in the article. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:26, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issue has now been addressed - brief quotes from reviews will be supplied in due course. See Opera, July 2011, p. 870 for further discussion. Niggle1892 ( talk) 12:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.