The result was DELETE. - Docg 14:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - article was nominated once previously, closed no consensus. The subject of this article does not pass WP:BIO which states that an actor's notability may be determined by that actor's having "significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions." This performer has no significant roles in anything, with credits including "Harlot (uncredited)" and the like. She is an extra. There are no reliable sources attesting to her notability. Her article is sourced by her own MySpace page, the self-promotional site imeem.com and IMDB. The only independent source is a supposed article in the Orange County Register, the existence of which is apparently unconfirmable online. Much was made in the last AFD about the reliability of IMDB as a citation, so I engaged in a little thought experiment. I uploaded a phony magazine credit for Reece to IMDB. The Orange Coast cover credit is false. IMDB did not fact check it or contact me as the uploader to verify its authenticity. IMDB is not, at least in regards to Reece, a reliable source. While each article is to be judged on its own merits, it is worth noting the deletion of other articles for other actors with a similar level of credits to Reece. Just a few of the recent examples include such non-notables as James McMahon and reality show contestant Scott Long and, tellingly, Hayley DuMond who is not only an actor with more substantive credits than Reece but who is married to a notable actor but was not considered notable in her own right. Given the failure of WP:BIO, the lack of reliable sources, the demonstrated unreliability of IMDB as a source and the precedent of the deletion of many other actors at a similar level of credits, this article should be deleted. Otto4711 21:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep per reasons given in the first AfD: the combination of IMDB-documented modeling & acting work and MySpace statistics (just the friends/hits/counts that the site records objectively) could meet WP:NOTE. -- JHunterJ 21:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. - Docg 14:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - article was nominated once previously, closed no consensus. The subject of this article does not pass WP:BIO which states that an actor's notability may be determined by that actor's having "significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions." This performer has no significant roles in anything, with credits including "Harlot (uncredited)" and the like. She is an extra. There are no reliable sources attesting to her notability. Her article is sourced by her own MySpace page, the self-promotional site imeem.com and IMDB. The only independent source is a supposed article in the Orange County Register, the existence of which is apparently unconfirmable online. Much was made in the last AFD about the reliability of IMDB as a citation, so I engaged in a little thought experiment. I uploaded a phony magazine credit for Reece to IMDB. The Orange Coast cover credit is false. IMDB did not fact check it or contact me as the uploader to verify its authenticity. IMDB is not, at least in regards to Reece, a reliable source. While each article is to be judged on its own merits, it is worth noting the deletion of other articles for other actors with a similar level of credits to Reece. Just a few of the recent examples include such non-notables as James McMahon and reality show contestant Scott Long and, tellingly, Hayley DuMond who is not only an actor with more substantive credits than Reece but who is married to a notable actor but was not considered notable in her own right. Given the failure of WP:BIO, the lack of reliable sources, the demonstrated unreliability of IMDB as a source and the precedent of the deletion of many other actors at a similar level of credits, this article should be deleted. Otto4711 21:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep per reasons given in the first AfD: the combination of IMDB-documented modeling & acting work and MySpace statistics (just the friends/hits/counts that the site records objectively) could meet WP:NOTE. -- JHunterJ 21:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC) reply