From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kølig Kaj. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE TICE CUBE) 15:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Solgt Ud!

Solgt Ud! (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be redirected to Kølig Kaj. I was unable to locate any reviews, in English or Danish, which would meet independent notability for this article. Further, as currently written this article is currently completely uncited and likely contains original research (sample language indicating OR: "It is quite a normal type of rap album for its day"). A previous attempt to redirect by another editor was reverted. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per nom, most of this is WP:OR. The album seems to get a mention in Skyum-Nielsen, Rune (2006). Nr. 1 - Dansk Hiphopkultur Siden 1983. p. 119. ISBN  8775141566. From the preview on Google Books, it doesn't look in-depth enough to write a standalone article off but this might be used in the artist's article. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 15:31, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect (with optional merge a little of the content if it is verifiable). The sources here are not good enough and notability is not close to being demonstrated. My first thought was to see if there was a Danish article with more details and better sourcing on it, but there isn't one at all. The Google searches don't look promising. Admittedly it is in a language that I don't understand and also it is a common phrase that turns up in other contexts but even if you add the artist's name to the search it isn't showing significant RS coverage. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 17:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Kølig Kaj for the reasons stated by everyone above. I am also suspicious of the rapper's notability but that is another discussion. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 15:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Merge With the Kolig Kaj article. It contains information which is verifiable via the album itself. Kolig Kaj is a notable rapper as he appeared in the 1997 Eurovision Song Contest. Cexycy ( talk) 03:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Kølig Kaj. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. SBKSPP ( talk) 03:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Kølig Kaj. 4meter4 ( talk) 04:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kølig Kaj. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE TICE CUBE) 15:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Solgt Ud!

Solgt Ud! (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be redirected to Kølig Kaj. I was unable to locate any reviews, in English or Danish, which would meet independent notability for this article. Further, as currently written this article is currently completely uncited and likely contains original research (sample language indicating OR: "It is quite a normal type of rap album for its day"). A previous attempt to redirect by another editor was reverted. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per nom, most of this is WP:OR. The album seems to get a mention in Skyum-Nielsen, Rune (2006). Nr. 1 - Dansk Hiphopkultur Siden 1983. p. 119. ISBN  8775141566. From the preview on Google Books, it doesn't look in-depth enough to write a standalone article off but this might be used in the artist's article. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 15:31, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect (with optional merge a little of the content if it is verifiable). The sources here are not good enough and notability is not close to being demonstrated. My first thought was to see if there was a Danish article with more details and better sourcing on it, but there isn't one at all. The Google searches don't look promising. Admittedly it is in a language that I don't understand and also it is a common phrase that turns up in other contexts but even if you add the artist's name to the search it isn't showing significant RS coverage. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 17:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Kølig Kaj for the reasons stated by everyone above. I am also suspicious of the rapper's notability but that is another discussion. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 15:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Merge With the Kolig Kaj article. It contains information which is verifiable via the album itself. Kolig Kaj is a notable rapper as he appeared in the 1997 Eurovision Song Contest. Cexycy ( talk) 03:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Kølig Kaj. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. SBKSPP ( talk) 03:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Kølig Kaj. 4meter4 ( talk) 04:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook