The result was redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 20th century. If there are differing opinions on the correct redirect target, please start a talk page discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails GNG: The eclipse only occurred in the Antarctica and its adjacent waters , and it is unlikely that anyone saw the eclipse at that time. Likewise, history does not record this eclipse, and this eclipse has no scientific value. Therefore, this eclipse is not of notability, and therefore the references in the entry do not prove notability, i.e., they do not constitute a valid introduction. Q28 ( talk) 01:15, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
it's a documented event, within a eclipse seriesis essentially WP:BUTITEXISTS. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 13:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Incidentally, it's quite telling that the redirect target has a list of six "notable eclipses of the 20th century", followed by a much longer list of eclipses that occurred. I suspect the correct solution is to have separate articles only about the notable eclipses, and to merge all the known information about the less notable ones into the list article. -- ais523 22:05, 19 June 2022 ( U T C)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It seems like the consensus is between Deletion or Redirect/Merge with several potential targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 20th century. If there are differing opinions on the correct redirect target, please start a talk page discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails GNG: The eclipse only occurred in the Antarctica and its adjacent waters , and it is unlikely that anyone saw the eclipse at that time. Likewise, history does not record this eclipse, and this eclipse has no scientific value. Therefore, this eclipse is not of notability, and therefore the references in the entry do not prove notability, i.e., they do not constitute a valid introduction. Q28 ( talk) 01:15, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
it's a documented event, within a eclipse seriesis essentially WP:BUTITEXISTS. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 13:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Incidentally, it's quite telling that the redirect target has a list of six "notable eclipses of the 20th century", followed by a much longer list of eclipses that occurred. I suspect the correct solution is to have separate articles only about the notable eclipses, and to merge all the known information about the less notable ones into the list article. -- ais523 22:05, 19 June 2022 ( U T C)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It seems like the consensus is between Deletion or Redirect/Merge with several potential targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)