The result was no consensus. Due to lack of contribution. There is therefore no prejudice against immediate renomination. Stifle ( talk) 09:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:RS and is probably original research. Links to page hint that an article with the same name was deleted in 2006 through proposed deletion, proposed on or near February 24th 2006 (see What Links Here for Soku-no-Kumi -- avjn ( talk) 18:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Due to lack of contribution. There is therefore no prejudice against immediate renomination. Stifle ( talk) 09:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:RS and is probably original research. Links to page hint that an article with the same name was deleted in 2006 through proposed deletion, proposed on or near February 24th 2006 (see What Links Here for Soku-no-Kumi -- avjn ( talk) 18:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC) reply