The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per nom. "end-to-end Software and Cloud Technology Solutions" Yummy! Also, if you're standing up your WP page on Businesswire, you're toast. Best
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
14:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep and To be improved The actual state of the article is really poor, but when looking to the original articles
SoftwareONE (alsWP) rsp.
SoftwareONE (deWP), the abvoe argument The whole article depends on the press releases can easily be refuted and used for upgrading. E.g. KKR involved, MS Partner of the Year, CRN: #14 of 500, sales US$ 7 bn.AVS (
talk)
05:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)reply
I don't think so. Of course, it's easy to delete - but our strive always should be, to improve instead negate. Need help with translation?
AVS (
talk)
04:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)reply
I can read both the Alemannic and the German version, but I don't really see a reason for those to be Wikipedia articles either, as they don't offer much more on notability as far as I can see
8ya (
talk •
contribs)
17:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Thank you, but I don't think any of these fulfill our criteria for notability, as they should fall under the points raised before
8ya (
talk •
contribs)
09:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Instead of again and again renewing your demamands, please study
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. It's you, who's in obligation to be active, as its YOU, who wants an action. Furthermore, some of the above arguments are simply false (The whole article depends on the press releases.). Just a few non-formal questions: What about
KKR, sales of 9 bn US$ - did you try to verify?
AVS (
talk)
05:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
@Avernarius:, may I ask which sources exactly you think fulfill our notability criteria? 8ya (talk • contribs) 09:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
8ya (
talk •
contribs)
10:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
but don't those fall under WP:INHERITORG and Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Examples_of_trivial_coverage? 8ya (talk • contribs) 13:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC) @Avernarius:, may I ask which sources exactly you think fulfill our notability criteria? 8ya (talk • contribs) 09:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC) 8ya (talk • contribs) 10:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
8ya (
talk •
contribs)
12:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per nom. "end-to-end Software and Cloud Technology Solutions" Yummy! Also, if you're standing up your WP page on Businesswire, you're toast. Best
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
14:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep and To be improved The actual state of the article is really poor, but when looking to the original articles
SoftwareONE (alsWP) rsp.
SoftwareONE (deWP), the abvoe argument The whole article depends on the press releases can easily be refuted and used for upgrading. E.g. KKR involved, MS Partner of the Year, CRN: #14 of 500, sales US$ 7 bn.AVS (
talk)
05:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)reply
I don't think so. Of course, it's easy to delete - but our strive always should be, to improve instead negate. Need help with translation?
AVS (
talk)
04:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)reply
I can read both the Alemannic and the German version, but I don't really see a reason for those to be Wikipedia articles either, as they don't offer much more on notability as far as I can see
8ya (
talk •
contribs)
17:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Thank you, but I don't think any of these fulfill our criteria for notability, as they should fall under the points raised before
8ya (
talk •
contribs)
09:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Instead of again and again renewing your demamands, please study
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. It's you, who's in obligation to be active, as its YOU, who wants an action. Furthermore, some of the above arguments are simply false (The whole article depends on the press releases.). Just a few non-formal questions: What about
KKR, sales of 9 bn US$ - did you try to verify?
AVS (
talk)
05:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
@Avernarius:, may I ask which sources exactly you think fulfill our notability criteria? 8ya (talk • contribs) 09:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
8ya (
talk •
contribs)
10:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)reply
but don't those fall under WP:INHERITORG and Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Examples_of_trivial_coverage? 8ya (talk • contribs) 13:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC) @Avernarius:, may I ask which sources exactly you think fulfill our notability criteria? 8ya (talk • contribs) 09:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC) 8ya (talk • contribs) 10:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
8ya (
talk •
contribs)
12:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.