- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 12:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Snowden Run 3D
- Snowden Run 3D ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable game. Merits a mention at Temple Run but not an article. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. ( G· N· B· S· RS· Talk) • Gene93k ( talk) 14:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
-- 84.193.243.31 ( talk) 12:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)It's an extremely notable game with the author currently working on a widely-publicized game on Vladimir Putin (dontmesswithputin.com) for which coverage also mentions Snowden Run 3D. No other newsgame has gotten as much press as Snowden Run 3D world wide. Snowden Run 3D was even discussed on MSNBC Hard Ball and written about in TV Guide. Looks like it meets WP:NVG, since it has "been the subject of significant commentary or analysis in published sources that are independent of the game developer." Therefore I am voting to keep. Short does not mean unnotable. Jinkinson talk to me 15:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 12:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Snowden Run 3D
- Snowden Run 3D ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable game. Merits a mention at Temple Run but not an article. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. ( G· N· B· S· RS· Talk) • Gene93k ( talk) 14:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
-- 84.193.243.31 ( talk) 12:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)It's an extremely notable game with the author currently working on a widely-publicized game on Vladimir Putin (dontmesswithputin.com) for which coverage also mentions Snowden Run 3D. No other newsgame has gotten as much press as Snowden Run 3D world wide. Snowden Run 3D was even discussed on MSNBC Hard Ball and written about in TV Guide. Looks like it meets WP:NVG, since it has "been the subject of significant commentary or analysis in published sources that are independent of the game developer." Therefore I am voting to keep. Short does not mean unnotable. Jinkinson talk to me 15:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.