The result was keep. Withdrawing nomination as new references added now satisfy WP:NOTE. MrNerdHair ( talk) 00:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The current popular culture references section does not satisfy notability guidelines. I'm rather pessimistic about the chances of finding reliable sources discussing this in depth, so I'm placing it on AfD. If you can find independent, reliable sources for this, good for you, you've saved an article. But otherwise, we need to get rid of this, as I'm guessing that it's a neologism too.
I'm not against covering sexual topics, even ones that people find offensive, on Wikipedia, but if we can't even follow our own guidelines in doing so, we're no better than the Urban Dictionary. MrNerdHair ( talk) 00:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment - Whoops, it appears there's been an AfD discussion on this article already. I should have checked for that before starting another one, sorry. However, while the previous discussion settles the issue of the term being a neologism (it's not), it doesn't discuss adherence to notability guidelines. I'm still claiming that none of the existing popular culture references satisfy
WP:NOTE as they don't "address the subject directly in detail." Perhaps this should be moved to Wiktionary?
MrNerdHair (
talk)
00:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Withdrawing nomination as new references added now satisfy WP:NOTE. MrNerdHair ( talk) 00:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The current popular culture references section does not satisfy notability guidelines. I'm rather pessimistic about the chances of finding reliable sources discussing this in depth, so I'm placing it on AfD. If you can find independent, reliable sources for this, good for you, you've saved an article. But otherwise, we need to get rid of this, as I'm guessing that it's a neologism too.
I'm not against covering sexual topics, even ones that people find offensive, on Wikipedia, but if we can't even follow our own guidelines in doing so, we're no better than the Urban Dictionary. MrNerdHair ( talk) 00:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment - Whoops, it appears there's been an AfD discussion on this article already. I should have checked for that before starting another one, sorry. However, while the previous discussion settles the issue of the term being a neologism (it's not), it doesn't discuss adherence to notability guidelines. I'm still claiming that none of the existing popular culture references satisfy
WP:NOTE as they don't "address the subject directly in detail." Perhaps this should be moved to Wiktionary?
MrNerdHair (
talk)
00:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
reply