- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 03:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- Smileycoin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Utterly non-notable cryptocurrency. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 21:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. No sources are provided which indicate notability; the page creator's edit summary "This page is about an electronic currency used for a purpose never used before, i.e. rewarding students in an open educational environment" is insufficient without reliable sources to indicate it, and maybe not even then as WP:TOOSOON. 331dot ( talk) 21:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - per WP:GNG and WP:ORG. I was able to locate this source here, but it's not enough to establish notability per WP:ORG (specifically, WP:ORGSIG). There doesn't appear to be significant coverage, and definitely nothing that shows that it should have it's own article in Wikipedia. No reliable independent sources have discussed it enough to bring this article to meet these guidelines. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - no indication of significance or importance. No substantial in-depth sources. Fails WP:GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - my searches found nothing particularly good with the best being this "benzinga". SwisterTwister talk 05:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 00:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 03:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- Smileycoin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Utterly non-notable cryptocurrency. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 21:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. No sources are provided which indicate notability; the page creator's edit summary "This page is about an electronic currency used for a purpose never used before, i.e. rewarding students in an open educational environment" is insufficient without reliable sources to indicate it, and maybe not even then as WP:TOOSOON. 331dot ( talk) 21:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - per WP:GNG and WP:ORG. I was able to locate this source here, but it's not enough to establish notability per WP:ORG (specifically, WP:ORGSIG). There doesn't appear to be significant coverage, and definitely nothing that shows that it should have it's own article in Wikipedia. No reliable independent sources have discussed it enough to bring this article to meet these guidelines. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - no indication of significance or importance. No substantial in-depth sources. Fails WP:GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - my searches found nothing particularly good with the best being this "benzinga". SwisterTwister talk 05:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 00:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.