The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (
WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.)
NorthAmerica1000 11:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Article seems to be mainly promotional.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 23:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I can see why you might come to that conclusion, especially when reading the 'products and services' section, but that part of the article can always be shortened and maybe even re-written if a change in the tone of that section is required. I don't believe this one reason is enough for the entire article to be deleted.(
Rillington (
talk) 14:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC))reply
Delete None of the sources help it really pass
wp:NCORP - not even the one I've just replaced with an archive.org link
Neonchameleon (
talk) 17:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (
WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.)
NorthAmerica1000 11:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Article seems to be mainly promotional.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 23:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I can see why you might come to that conclusion, especially when reading the 'products and services' section, but that part of the article can always be shortened and maybe even re-written if a change in the tone of that section is required. I don't believe this one reason is enough for the entire article to be deleted.(
Rillington (
talk) 14:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC))reply
Delete None of the sources help it really pass
wp:NCORP - not even the one I've just replaced with an archive.org link
Neonchameleon (
talk) 17:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.