From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Woody Woodpecker filmography. ♠ PMC(talk) 12:14, 26 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Sleep Happy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet GNG. Article has just 1 reference, and I cannot find any SIGCOV from a basic before search. Like most Woody Woodpecker films, it is not notable enough to justify an article, and should be redirected. This is what I did initially, but my redirect was reverted, so I am taking the article to AfD. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 03:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Woody Woodpecker filmography. ♠ PMC(talk) 12:14, 26 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Sleep Happy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet GNG. Article has just 1 reference, and I cannot find any SIGCOV from a basic before search. Like most Woody Woodpecker films, it is not notable enough to justify an article, and should be redirected. This is what I did initially, but my redirect was reverted, so I am taking the article to AfD. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 03:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook